• J Formos Med Assoc · Jan 2021

    Prognostic significance of positive surgical margins for scalp angiosarcoma.

    • Chen-Hsiang Kuan, Hung-Wei Yang, Hui-Fu Huang, Lukas Jyuhn-Hsiarn Lee, Tsai-Yu Tseng, Jung-Hsien Hsieh, Nai-Chen Cheng, Hao-Chih Tai, and Hong-Shiee Lai.
    • Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan; Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
    • J Formos Med Assoc. 2021 Jan 1; 120 (1 Pt 1): 217-225.

    BackgroundScalp angiosarcomas (AS) are aggressive soft tissue sarcomas that present with outcomes different from other AS of the head and neck region. Due to the rarity of the disease, limited data on the clinical outcome of scalp AS are available. In particular, the prognostic significance of surgical margins remains controversial and the impact of margin status on survival has not been documented.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed 41 scalp AS patients, including 30 patients with localized disease and 11 patients with initial distant metastasis, treated in our institution between 1997 and 2017. Survival was determined by Kaplan-Meier analysis. In the 30 patients without distant metastasis (localized disease), univariate and multivariate analysis using the Cox proportional hazards model were used to determine clinicopathologic characteristics associated with recurrence free survival (RFS), locoregional control (LRC), and overall survival (OS).ResultsTotally 41 patients diagnosed with scalp AS were identified, including 30 patients with localized disease and 11 patients with initial distant metastasis on diagnosis. Overall, the median follow-up period was 19.3 (range 0.3-128.5) months. The median survival time was 16.6 (range 0.3-144.3) months and the 5-year OS (95% Confidence Interval (CI)) rate was 22% (12%-42%). In the 30 patients with localized disease, univariate analysis showed that positive margins, either lateral-side or deep-side, were significant prognostic factors for RFS, LRC, and OS (p < 0.05). On multivariate analysis, positive margins emerged as adverse prognostic factors for RFS (Hazard Ratio (HR) 4.29, 95% CI, 1.71-10.75, p = 0.002), LRC (HR 6.35, 95% CI, 2.19-18.37, p = 0.001), and OS (HR 4.73, 95% CI, 1.71-13.07, p = 0.003).ConclusionScalp AS is associated with high local recurrence rates and poor survival outcomes. Positive surgical margins are adverse prognostic factors for survival.Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier B.V.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…