• Auris, nasus, larynx · Aug 2015

    Quantitative analysis of facial palsy using a three-dimensional facial motion measurement system.

    • Sachiyo Katsumi, Shinichi Esaki, Koosuke Hattori, Koji Yamano, Taizo Umezaki, and Shingo Murakami.
    • Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences and Medical School, Kawasumi 1, Mizuho-cho, Mizuho-ku, Nagoya 467-0001, Japan.
    • Auris Nasus Larynx. 2015 Aug 1; 42 (4): 275-83.

    ObjectiveThe prognosis for facial nerve palsy (FNP) depends on its severity. Currently, many clinicians use the Yanagihara, House-Brackmann, and/or Sunnybrook grading systems to assess FNP. Although these assessments are performed by experts, inter- and intra-observer disagreements have been demonstrated. The quantitative and objective analyses of the degree of FNP would be preferred to monitor functional changes and to plan and evaluate therapeutic interventions in patients with FNP. Numerous two-dimensional (2-D) assessments have been proposed, however, the limitations of 2-D assessment have been reported. The purpose of this study was to introduce a three-dimensional (3-D) image generation system for the analysis of facial nerve palsy (FNP) and to show the correlation between the severity of FNP assessed by this method and two conventional systems.MethodsFive independent facial motions, resting, eyebrow raise, gentle eye closure, full smile with lips open and whistling were recorded with our system and the images were then analyzed using our software. The regional and gross facial symmetries were analyzed. The predicted scores were calculated and compared to the Yanagihara and H-B grading scores. We analyzed 15 normal volunteers and 42 patients with FNP.ResultsThe results showed that 3-D analysis could measure mouth movement in the anteroposterior direction, whereas two-dimensional analysis could not. The system results showed good correlation with the clinical results from the Yanagihara (r(2)=0.86) and House-Brackmann (r(2)=0.81) grading scales.ConclusionThis objective method can produce consistent results that align with two conventional systems. Therefore, this method is ideally suited for use in a routine clinical setting.Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.