-
- Yi-Chieh Lee, Chien-Chia Su, Tsing-Hong Wang, and Jehn-Yu Huang.
- Department of Ophthalmology, National Taiwan University Hospital Hsin-Chu Branch, Hsin-Chu, Taiwan.
- J Formos Med Assoc. 2021 Jan 1; 120 (1 Pt 2): 415-421.
BackgroundCataract surgery in combination with or after trabeculectomy is often required for improving vision in glaucoma patients. Intraocular pressure (IOP) changes may influence refractive outcomes after cataract surgery. We compared refractive outcomes of the combined and sequential approaches in managing glaucoma and cataract.MethodsThis retrospective case-control study included 52 patients (57 eyes) who underwent phacotrabeculectomy (combined group) and 39 patients (42 eyes) who underwent phacoemulsification at least three months post-trabeculectomy (sequential group). The IOP and refraction prediction error were compared at three months after cataract surgery. Univariate regression analyses were used to assess risk factors for the postoperative refraction prediction error.ResultsAnti-glaucomatous medications were not administered to either group. The mean postoperative IOP (12.96 vs. 13.80 mmHg; P = .392), refraction prediction error (-0.32 ± 1.53 vs. -0.47 ± 1.14 D, P = .594), mean absolute error (1.02 ± 1.18 vs. 0.8 ± 0.93 D, P = .320), and surgically induced astigmatism (1.85 ± 1.40 vs. 2.16 ± 1.16 D, P = .161) did not differ significantly between the combined and sequential groups. In the sequential group, the refraction prediction error correlated to the IOP change, with a 1-mm Hg rise resulting in a -0.07-diopter shift between the expected and observed refraction (r = -0.380, R2 = 0.144, P = .013); no such correlation was observed in the combined group.ConclusionBoth approaches resulted in similar effective IOP control and accurate intraocular lens predictability. The IOP change affected the postoperative refraction prediction error only in the sequential approach.Copyright © 2020. Published by Elsevier B.V.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.