• Chest · Jul 2020

    Review

    A Framework for the Evaluation of Statistical Prediction Models.

    • Michael W Kattan and Thomas A Gerds.
    • Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH. Electronic address: kattanm@ccf.org.
    • Chest. 2020 Jul 1; 158 (1S): S29-S38.

    AbstractWe have entered the era of "big data" and with that the explosion of interest in prediction modeling. With this explosion comes the challenge of evaluating statistical prediction models, both from the standpoint of an author as well as a reviewer. This article provides guidance for the evaluation and critique of a statistical prediction model. Hopefully, this will improve the quality of statistical prediction modeling studies and facilitate their review.Copyright © 2020 American College of Chest Physicians. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…