-
Multicenter Study
A European multicentre reappraisal of distal compound muscle action potential duration in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy.
- Y A Rajabally, J Lagarde, J Cassereau, K Viala, E Fournier, and G Nicolas.
- Department of Neurology and Neurophysiology, Neuromuscular Clinic, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester, UK. yusuf.rajabally@uhl-tr.nhs.uk
- Eur. J. Neurol. 2012 Apr 1; 19 (4): 638-42.
BackgroundThe electrodiagnostic value of distal compound muscle action potential duration (DCMAPD) has been studied rarely in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP). Cut-offs proposed have not been widely evaluated. The influence of low-cut EMG filter settings ≤ 10 Hz as used in Europe is uncertain.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed records of 110 patients with typical, treatment-responsive CIDP, from Leicester, U.K., Paris and Angers, France. All fulfilled revised European Federation of Neurological Societies/Peripheral Nerve Society (EFNS/PNS) clinical and electrodiagnostic criteria for typical CIDP (2010), before consideration of DCMAPD prolongation. Results were compared with those of 110 controls with chronic sensory/sensory-motor axonal neuropathy. We constructed receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for each nerve and derived cut-offs for DCMAPD prolongation, offering specificity of ≥ 98% vs. controls.ResultsDCMAPD was significantly greater in all nerves for CIDP patients, compared with controls (P < 0.001). ROC curves allowed derivation of cut-offs of sensitivities ranging from 27.1% (ulnar nerve) to 60% (tibial nerve). Using these cut-offs to define DCMAPD prolongation in any studied motor nerve offered a sensitivity of 69.1% for CIDP and specificity of 97.3% vs. controls.ConclusionCut-offs for DCMAPD are dependent on EMG filter settings. DCMAPD prolongation in any motor nerve, using our derived cut-offs, represents a sensitive and specific marker of CIDP in patients studied with EMG equipment with low-cut filter settings ≤ 10 Hz. Appropriate use of this parameter appears an essential criterion to consider in assessing suspected CIDP, which may be helpful in limiting extensiveness and duration of electrophysiological testing, thereby reducing patient discomfort.© 2011 The Author(s). European Journal of Neurology © 2011 EFNS.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.