• J Med Assoc Thai · Mar 2014

    Comparisons of the latching on between newborns with tongue-tie and normal newborns.

    • Pawin Puapornpong, Kasem Raungrongmorakot, Visan Mahasitthiwat, and Sukwadee Ketsuwan.
    • J Med Assoc Thai. 2014 Mar 1; 97 (3): 255-9.

    BackgroundBreastfeeding is recommended as the exclusive feeding for the first six months of the newborns life. Difficulty in latching and breastfeeding resulting from tongue-tie are believed to be a problem.ObjectiveTo compare the latching on between newborns with tongue-tie (ankyloglossia) and normal newborns.Material And MethodThe subjects were 833 normal, postpartum women who delivered without complications at HRH Princess Maha Chakri Sririndhorn Medical Center in Nakhon Nayok Province between January and June 2013. Their newborns oral cavities' were checked for tongue-tie screening and diagnoses using Kotlow's criteria. Latch scores were used for latch-on assessment at the second day postpartum. Demographic data and latch scores were collected and analyzed by the t-test, Chi-square test, Odds ratio with 95% confidence interval and One-way of ANOVA test.ResultsThe data shows that the incidence of tongue-tie was 13.4% (6.2% with mild tongue-tie, 5.5% with moderate tongue-tie, and 1.7% with severe tongue-tie). The mean of latch scores in the tongue-tied groups were significantly lower than that in the normal group, especially in the moderate and severe tongue-tie subgroups. The odds ratios for latch scores were < or = 8 compared between the moderate and severe tongue-tied subgroups and the score in the normal and mild tongue-tied subgroups was 1.4.ConclusionThe latch scores in tongue-tied newborns were significantly lower than those in normal newborns.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…