• Simi Koshy, Paul J Feustel, Michael Hong, and Barry A Kogan.
• Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Albany Medical College, Albany, New York, USA.
• J. Urol. 2010 Jul 1; 184 (1): 258-62.

PurposeThe increasing use of electronic medical records during the clinical encounter brings not only benefits but also barriers that may affect the doctor-patient relationship and increase the work burden of the physician. We evaluated whether the use of an electronic medical record scribe in an academic urology program would ameliorate these problems.Materials And MethodsWe randomly assigned electronic medical record scribes to the office hours of 5 academic urologists, and using surveys we evaluated patient and physician acceptance and satisfaction.ResultsPatients were accepting of an electronic medical record scribe and satisfaction rates were high (93% vs 87% in the absence of a scribe, p = 0.36). Patients were comfortable disclosing urological information in the presence of the scribe. Physicians were dramatically more satisfied with office hours when a scribe was present (69% vs 19%, p <0.001). We were unable to determine whether the presence of a scribe improves productivity.ConclusionsElectronic medical record scribes in a urology practice may be a practical solution to provide documentation while maintaining or improving the doctor-patient relationship because they increase physician satisfaction and do not detract from patient satisfaction.Copyright (c) 2010 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

12 keywords...

hide…