-
- Eik Bjerre, Klaus Brasso, and Julie Midtgaard.
- UCSF, Afsnit 9701, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 København Ø. eb@ucsf.dk.
- Ugeskr. Laeg. 2015 Jul 27; 177 (31).
AbstractHigh-quality scientific evidence may be inadequate to support real world decision-making. Assessment of applicability and generalizability of medical scientific evidence is needed for the practitioner. Often, large differences between trial participants and actual end-users of interventions exist. We present the difference between efficacy and effectiveness in connection with trial design and encourage critical evaluation of external validity. Pragmatic design of trials can be considered a preferred choice to limit the prevailing gap between current evidence and practice.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.