• Christopher Jl Newth, Justin C Hotz, and Robinder G Khemani.
• Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California. cnewth@chla.usc.edu.
• Respir Care. 2020 Oct 1; 65 (10): 1601-1610.

AbstractDespite the accepted importance of minimizing time on mechanical ventilation, only limited guidance on weaning and extubation is available from the pediatric literature. A significant proportion of patients being evaluated for weaning are actually ready for extubation, suggesting that weaning is often not considered early enough in the course of ventilation. Indications for extubation are often not clear, although a trial of spontaneous breathing on CPAP without pressure support seems an appropriate prerequisite in many cases. Several indexes have been developed to predict weaning and extubation success, but the available literature suggests they offer little or no improvement over clinical judgment. New techniques for assessing readiness for weaning and predicting extubation success are being developed but are far from general acceptance in pediatric practice. While there have been some excellent physiologic, observational, and even randomized controlled trials on aspects of pediatric ventilator liberation, robust research data are lacking. Given the lack of data in many areas, a determined approach that combines systematic review with consensus opinion of international experts could generate high-quality recommendations and terminology definitions to guide clinical practice and highlight important areas for future research in weaning, extubation readiness, and liberation from mechanical ventilation following pediatric respiratory failure.Copyright © 2020 by Daedalus Enterprises.

21 keywords...

hide…