• Anthony P Kronfli, Erik Lehman, Kentaro Yamane, S Michael Roberts, and Theodore J Cios.
• Department of Surgery, The Pennsylvania State University, College of Medicine, Hershey, PA. Electronic address: akronfli@pennstatehealth.psu.edu.
• J. Cardiothorac. Vasc. Anesth. 2021 Feb 1; 35 (2): 439-445.

ObjectiveTranscatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with monitored anesthesia care (MAC) is well-tolerated and is growing in popularity. Differences in outcomes based on anesthetic agent choice with MAC has received less attention. The authors sought to determine whether differences in outcomes and cost exist based on whether patients receive dexmedetomidine or propofol when undergoing TAVR with MAC.DesignRetrospective cohort study.SettingThe Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania.ParticipantsThe study comprised 161 patients who underwent TAVR with MAC between May 2014 and March 2019.InterventionsNone.Measurements And Main ResultsA propofol-only (n = 58) group and dexmedetomidine-only (n = 103) group were identified. No differences in in-hospital mortality or complication rate were identified when evaluating for stroke, transfusion, new arrhythmia, cardiac arrest, or bleeding and vascular complications (p > 0.05, all). Thirty-day outcomes were also equivalent, with no differences in mortality, stroke, vascular complication, new arrhythmia, or myocardial infarction (p > 0.05, all). The average amount of epinephrine, norepinephrine, or phenylephrine used intraoperatively was not significantly different. Overall median hospitalization costs were equivalent ($57,554.31 with dexmedetomidine v $58,538.08 with propofol, p = 0.97).ConclusionsThere were no significant differences in in-hospital outcomes, 30-day outcomes, or total cost of the patient's hospitalization, based on the use of dexmedetomidine versus propofol in patients undergoing TAVR.Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

14 keywords...

hide…