• Xin Huang, Chuanbo Xie, Jie Tang, Wenzhuo He, Fan Yang, Wenfang Tian, Jundong Li, Qiuxia Yang, Jingxian Shen, Liangping Xia, and Chunyan Lan.
• Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Centre, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou, 510060, Guangdong, China.
• Bmc Med. 2020 Oct 5; 18 (1): 267.

BackgroundVascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-targeted therapy is effective in patients with ovarian cancer. Whether adipose tissue (AT) could predict the efficacy of VEGF receptor (VEGFR) inhibitors in ovarian cancer is unknown. We aimed to evaluate the ability of distinct AT depots to predict the efficacy of apatinib, a VEGFR inhibitor, in recurrent ovarian cancers included in the AEROC trial.MethodsThe AEROC was a single-arm phase 2 trial of apatinib and oral etoposide in patients with platinum-resistant or platinum-refractory ovarian cancer. Apatinib was administered continuously, and oral etoposide was administered every 21 days for a maximum of six cycles. This was a post hoc study based on the AEROC trial. Areas of visceral AT (VAT), subcutaneous AT (SAT), and intermuscular AT (IMAT) were measured using computed tomography scan at baseline to assess their association with the objective response rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival.ResultsOf the 35 treated patients, 31 patients with at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment by computed tomography scan were included in this study. After adjusting for apatinib exposure, high VAT (odds ratio [OR], 0.16; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.03-0.90, P = 0.037) and SAT (OR, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.03-0.87, P = 0.034) were significantly associated with a higher objective response rate. Further, decreased risks of disease progression and death were associated with high VAT (hazard ratio [HR], 0.39; 95% CI, 0.17-0.92, P = 0.031, and HR, 0.12; 95% CI, 0.04-0.40, P < 0.001, respectively), SAT (HR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.15-0.83, P = 0.027, and HR, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.08-0.67, P = 0.007, respectively), and IMAT (HR, 0.20; 95% CI, 0.06-0.74, P = 0.016, and HR, 0.13; 95% CI, 0.03-0.62, P = 0.011, respectively).ConclusionsHigh areas of VAT, SAT, and IMAT were significantly associated with better outcomes in patients with platinum-resistant or platinum-refractory ovarian cancer who received VEGFR inhibitors. AT assessments may be valuable as patient-specific imaging biomarkers for predicting response to VEGFR inhibitors.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02867956 .

28 keywords...

hide…