• Bei Yun, Qian Su, Yi-Tong Cai, Lian Chen, Chao-Ran Qu, and Lin Han.
• School of nursing, Lanzhou University.
• Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Oct 2; 99 (40): e21668.

BackgroundOne of the major challenges in nursing and medical education is to foster the critical thinking ability and autonomous learning ability for students. But the effect of different teaching methods on these abilities of nursing or medical students has not been conclusive, and few studies have directly compared the differences in the effects of different teaching methods. As a result, it is necessary for students to evaluate the impact of different teaching methods on critical thinking ability and autonomous learning ability.MethodsA systematic search will be performed using Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Data (Chinese database), VIP Information (Chinese database), Chinese Biomedical Literature, and English language databases, including PubMed and Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL Complete (EBSCO0, Cochrane library to identify relevant studies from inception to July 10, 2020. We will include random controlled trials that evaluated the different teaching methods. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 quality assessment tool will be used to assess the risk of bias in each study. Standard pairwise meta-analysis and network meta-analysis will be performed using STATA V.12.0, MetaDiSc 1.40, and R 3.4.1 software to compare the diagnostic efficacy of different hormonal biomarkers.ResultsThe results of this study will be published in a peer-reviewed journal.ConclusionThis study will summarize the direct and indirect evidence to determine the effectiveness of different teaching methods for medical or nursing students and attempt to find the most effective teaching method.Ethics And DisseminationEthics approval and patient consent are not required, because this study is a meta-analysis based on published studies.Inplasy Registration NumberINPLASY202070017.

19 keywords...

hide…