• Respiratory medicine · Nov 1989

    Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial

    A prospective randomized comparison of fine needle aspiration biopsy and fibreoptic bronchoscopy in the investigation of peripheral pulmonary opacities.

    • C R Swinburn, D Veale, E T Peel, V Wadehra, S T Elliott, M D Sumerling, P A Corris, and G J Gibson.
    • Regional Cardiothoracic Unit, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, U.K.
    • Respir Med. 1989 Nov 1; 83 (6): 493-5.

    AbstractTwenty-nine patients, aged 66(+/- 7) years with a peripheral pulmonary opacity (mean diameter 3.6 +/- 1.8 cm) believed to be a tumor, were randomly allocated to initial investigation by either fibreoptic bronchoscopy or percutaneous fine needle aspiration biopsy, the latter performed under fluoroscopic control. The patients proceeded to the alternative investigation in the event of the first failing to achieve a diagnosis. Malignancy was confirmed by the initial procedure in 14/15 patients randomized to fine needle aspiration biopsy but only in 1/14 patients randomized to fibreoptic bronchoscopy (P less than 0.01). Overall, these figures were 25/28 fine needle aspiration biopsy and 2/15 fibreoptic bronchoscopy (P less than 0.01). These results confirm the clinical suspicion that fine needle aspiration biopsy is far more likely than fibreoptic bronchoscopy to establish the presence of malignancy in peripheral pulmonary opacities.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…