• Kannan Sridharan, Gowri Sivaramakrishnan, and Jerome Gnanaraj.
• a Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, College of Medicine and Medical Sciences , Arabian Gulf University , Manama , Bahrain.
• Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2018 Feb 1; 19 (2): 151-158.

BackgroundProton pump inhibitors (PPI), histamine-2 receptor antagonists (H2RA), sucralfate and antacids are the commonly administered agents for stress ulcer prophylaxis (SUP) in critically ill patients. The authors of this paper have conducted a network meta-analysis to compare the efficacy of these agents in SUP.MethodsElectronic databases were searched for randomized controlled trials, cohort studies and conference abstracts for studies comparing a SUP agent in critically ill patients to another active SUP agent or placebo. Overt, occult and clinically significant upper gastro-intestinal (UGI) bleeding, all-cause mortality, pneumonia, gastric colonization and ICU length of stay were considered as the outcome measures. A random effects model was used to generate pooled estimates.ResultsA total of 53 studies (4258 participants) were included. The pooled estimates were in favor of PPI and sucralfate for the overt UGI bleeding. PPI and H2RA bolus were associated with increased risk of gastric colonization and pneumonia.ConclusionsSUP in critically ill patients was not associated with any benefit with regard to clinically significant bleeding episodes. However, PPI and sucralfate significantly reduces overt UGI bleeding. On the contrary, PPI and H2RA bolus are associated with an increased risk of gastric colonization and pneumonia.

21 keywords...

hide…