• Réka Balogh, Nóra Imre, Edina Papp, Ildikó Kovács, Szilvia Heim, Kázmér Karádi, Ferenc Hajnal, Magdolna Pákáski, and János Kálmán.
• Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
• Eur J Gen Pract. 2020 Dec 1; 26 (1): 7-13.

AbstractBackground: Undetected dementia in primary care is a global problem. Since general practitioners (GPs) act as the first step in the identification process, examining their routines could help us to enhance the currently low recognition rates.Objectives: The study aimed to explore, for the first time in Hungary, the dementia identification practices and views of GPs.Methods: In the context of an extensive, national survey (February-November 2014) 8% of all practicing GPs in Hungary (n = 402) filled in a self-administered questionnaire. The questions (single, multiple-choice, Likert-type) analysed in the present study explored GPs' methods and views regarding dementia identification and their ideas about the optimal circumstances of case-finding.Results: The vast majority of responding GPs (97%) agreed that the early recognition of dementia would enhance both the patients' and their relatives' well-being. When examining the possibility of dementia, most GPs (91%) relied on asking the patients general questions and only a quarter of them (24%) used formal tests, even though they were mostly satisfied with both the Clock Drawing Test (69%) and the Mini-Mental State Examination (65%). Longer consultation time was chosen as the most important facet of improvement needed for better identification of dementia in primary care (81%). Half of the GPs (49%) estimated dementia recognition rate to be lower than 30% in their practice.Conclusions: Hungarian GPs were aware of the benefits of early recognition, but the shortage of consultation time in primary care was found to be a major constraint on efficient case-finding.

20 keywords...

hide…