• Renea L Beckstrand, Nicole Lamoreaux, Karlen E Luthy, and Janelle L B Macintosh.
• Renea L. Beckstrand, PhD, RN, CCRN, CNE, is a professor, Brigham Young University College of Nursing, Provo, Utah. Nicole Lamoreaux, MS, FNP-c, is a graduate student, CV ICU, Utah Valley Hospital, Provo. Karlen E. Luthy, DNP, FNP-c, FAAN, FAANP, is an associate professor, Brigham Young University College of Nursing, Provo, Utah. Janelle L.B. Macintosh, PhD, RN, is an associate professor, Brigham Young University College of Nursing, Provo, Utah.
• Dimens Crit Care Nurs. 2017 Mar 1; 36 (2): 94-105.

BackgroundNurses working in intensive care units (ICUs) frequently care for patients and their families at the end of life (EOL). Providing high-quality EOL care is important for both patients and families, yet ICU nurses face many obstacles that hinder EOL care. Researchers have identified various ICU nurse-perceived obstacles, but no studies have been found addressing the progress that has been made for the last 17 years.ObjectiveThe aims of this study were to determine the most common and current obstacles in EOL care as perceived by ICU nurses and then to evaluate whether meaningful changes have occurred since data were first gathered in 1998.MethodsA quantitative-qualitative mixed methods design was used. A random, geographically dispersed sample of 2000 members of the American Association of Critical-Care Nurses was surveyed.ResultsFive obstacle items increased in mean score and rank as compared with 1999 data including (1) family not understanding what the phrase "lifesaving measures" really means, (2) providing lifesaving measures at families' requests despite patient's advance directive listing no such care, (3) family not accepting patient's poor prognosis, (4) family members fighting about the use of life support, and (5) not enough time to provide EOL care because the nurse is consumed with lifesaving measures attempting to save the patient's life. Five obstacle items decreased in mean score and rank compared with 1999 data including (1) physicians differing in opinion about care of the patient, (2) family and friends who continually call the nurse rather than calling the designated family member, (3) physicians who are evasive and avoid families, (4) nurses having to deal with angry families, and (5) nurses not knowing their patient's wishes regarding continuing with tests and treatments.ConclusionsObstacles in EOL care, as perceived by critical care nurses, still exist. Family-related obstacles have increased over time. Obstacles related to families may not be easily overcome as each family, dealing with a dying family member in an ICU, likely has not previously experienced a similar situation. On the basis of the current top 5 obstacles, recommendations for possible areas of focus include (1) improved health literacy assessment of families followed by earlier directed, appropriate, and specific EOL information; (2) improved physician/team communication; and (3) ensuring patients' wishes are followed as written. In general, patient- and family-centered care using clear and open EOL communication regarding wishes and desires between patients and families, their physicians, and nurses will help decrease common obstacles, thus improving the quality of EOL care provided to dying patients and families.

8 keywords...

hide…