-
- M A Soljak.
- N. Z. Med. J. 1984 Jan 25; 97 (748): 37-9.
AbstractAn attempt was made to find the number of confirmed immunisations received by a group of Whangarei four-year-olds. The claims made for the immunisation benefit by each child's general practitioner were compared with questionnaire responses given by the parents of the children. Of 135 parents, 91.1% claimed that their child had received all four early childhood immunisations. Corresponding claims for the immunisation benefit by the child's general practitioner for all four immunisations were found in only 34.9% of cases. There was 79.7% agreement between parental reports and general practitioners' claims for the three-month immunisation. Corresponding figures were 72.3%, 67.2% and 66.4% for the five-, twelve- and eighteen-month immunisations respectively. These findings suggest that many children miss one or two immunisations rather than a few missing most. Present methods of monitoring may therefore tend to over-estimate the level of full immunisation. Computerisation of immunisation data is proposed as an alternative.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.