• M J Guedj, Ph Raynaud, A Braitman, and D Vanderschooten.
• Praticien Hospitalier, responsable du Centre Psychiatrique d'Orientation et d'Accueil, Centre Hospitalier Sainte-Anne, 1, rue Cabanis, 75674 Paris cedex 14.
• Encephale. 2004 Jan 1; 30 (1): 32-9.

AbstractThe practice of physical restraint is relatively frequent in medical emergency and geriatric units. Its use in psychiatry is controversial. Although distinct, it is often associated with seclusion, as a response to or prevention of agitated mentally ill patients'behavior. A detailed review of the literature shows the scarceness of work defining the exclusive use of restraint without seclusion. We report a naturalistic study over 6 Months, covering 76 cases having required restraint. The study of the international literature concerns nursing care, geriatric, child-adolescent psychiatric and adult psychiatric reviews. The restraint is a usual practice in general care like emergency, intensive care or geriatric units in order to prevent the patients from falling or to administrate certain care. Legal action has been reported as a consequence of lack of information or agreement of the family. The psychiatric use of restraint is conceived as an additional measure to seclusion, which is a controversial procedure from a therapeutic point of view as well as because of its long duration of application. The practice of restraint described in French literature, from Pinel (in to Daumézon and from French hospital regulations to "transparency forms", seems to be more easily accepted for its short duration and its careful prescription in order to maintain relations with the patients, including agitated children. We made a 6 Months retrospective study in a Parisian psychiatric emergency unit receiving an average of 30 patients a day. The rate of restraint is 1.4%. The objective was to describe the main clinical, epidemiological and situational characteristics and to define quality criteria concerning restraint regarding to the existing standards. We had at our disposal a restraint protocol in order to avoid its prescription as a punishment or for the comfort or the convenience of an insufficient staff. The decision of the restraint is directly prescribed by a physician or decided in emergency by the nurses and then rapidly confirmed by medical prescription. In short, most restrained patients are male, the average age is 32 Years old, and the diagnoses associated with restraint in order of frequency are schizophrenia, personality disorders, acute psychotic episodes, manic episodes and toxic abuses. The main early-warning signs are aggressiveness, delusions, opposition, paranoiac thoughts and distrust. The average duration is 2 hours with continuous clinical supervision and a relational contact maintained. Our study confirms the notion of cumulate restraint days. Actually, 43% of the restraints happen on the same day as others do. The high rate on those days could be as Fischer hypothesized the result of instinctive, aggressive and sexual release of the staff, as well as the consequence of an increase in anxiety and agitation of the other patients. The legal framework is more the duty of assistance to a person in danger than constrained hospitalization, which is not systematically pronounced. No injury or somatic complication occurred during restraint. Neither complaint from the patient or his family nor sick leave of staff was recorded. The specific use of restraint can be compared to the existing standards for using the seclusion room. Among those standards only 1 of 23 criteria was not verified. The others was applicable or without object. The therapeutic use of restraint requires the development of specific quality standards, and the existing criteria concerning seclusion represent a necessary but insufficient answer. We emphasize the need to take into account the early warning signs, a response to the cumulative restraint days, as well as a satisfaction study on patients and the feasibility of such a study in an emergency service.

19 keywords...

hide…