• F H Levine, D M Philbin, K Kono, C H Coggins, C W Emerson, W G Austen, and M J Buckley.
• Ann. Thorac. Surg. 1981 Jul 1; 32 (1): 63-7.

AbstractThe use of pulsatile perfusion during bypass should create a more physiological milieu and thus attenuate the vasopressin stress response. To determine this, 20 patients scheduled for elective coronary artery bypass operation were studied in two groups. Group 1 had a standard nonpulsatile perfusion, and in Group 2 a pulsatile pump was used. Measurements were made before and after anesthesia, after surgical incision, and at 15 and 30 minutes during and after cardiopulmonary bypass. In both groups, vasopressin levels were significantly elevated after sternotomy (4.5 +/- 1.5 to 37 +/- 10 pg/ml in Group 1 and 3.1 +/- 1.2 to 33 +/- 9 pg/ml in Group 2, p less than 0.05) and during bypass (198 +/- 19 pg/ml in Group 1 and 113 +/- 16 pg/ml in Group 2) but were higher in Group 1 (p less than 0.05). With comparable perfusion pressures in both groups, Group 2 required higher flow (4.2 +/- 0.2 versus 3.5 +/- 0.3 L/min, p less than 0.05) and had lower resistance (1,351 +/- 182 versus 1,841 +/- 229 dynes sec cm-5, p less than 0.05) and higher urine Na+ (123 +/- 5 versus 101 +/- 8 mEq/L, p less than 0.05). These data demonstrate that pulsatile flow can significantly attentuate the vasopressin stress response to bypass. Since vasopressin, at these concentrations, is a potent vasoconstrictor and is capable of producing a Na+ diuresis, this may partially explain the higher flow requirements and the decrease in Na+ excretion.

11 keywords...

hide…