• J Bone Joint Surg Am · Nov 2019

    Multicenter Study

    Three-Column Classification for Acetabular Fractures: Introduction and Reproducibility Assessment.

    • Ruipeng Zhang, Yingchao Yin, Ao Li, Zhongzheng Wang, Zhiyong Hou, Yan Zhuang, Shicai Fan, Zhanyong Wu, Chengla Yi, Gang Lyu, Xianzhong Ma, and Yingze Zhang.
    • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, People's Republic of China.
    • J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019 Nov 20; 101 (22): 2015-2025.

    BackgroundThe Judet-Letournel classification has been widely used to diagnose acetabular fractures since it was proposed. However, there has been growing evidence of incompleteness and comprehension difficulty in this classification, which may adversely affect its clinical use. The purposes of this study were to introduce a novel 3-column classification system for acetabular fractures and to evaluate its reliability and reproducibility.MethodsA total of 1,028 patients with acetabular fractures, who had undergone surgical treatment from June 2011 to January 2017 in 7 level-I trauma centers, were recruited into this study. Preoperative radiographs and computed tomographic (CT) scans were conducted for each patient. To evaluate the reproducibility of the 3-column classification system for acetabular fractures, the interobserver and intraobserver reliability (kappa coefficient, κ) of this classification system compared with those of the Judet-Letournel classification system was investigated by 4 observers.ResultsA total of 209 patients (20.33%) could not be classified by the Judet-Letournel classification, and 3 cases (0.29%) could not be classified by the novel 3-column classification. The mean κ value of the interobserver reliability for the Judet-Letournel classification was 0.591 (range, 0.508 to 0.681), indicating moderate agreement, whereas the mean κ value was 0.735 (range, 0.594 to 0.930), indicating substantial agreement, when using the 3-column classification. The mean κ value for the intraobserver reliability was 0.751 (range, 0.708 to 0.793) for the Judet-Letournel classification and 0.909 (range, 0.792 to 0.957) for the 3-column classification.ConclusionsThe 3-column classification, based on the anatomic character of the acetabulum, showed higher interobserver and intraobserver reliability than the Judet-Letournel classification. Additionally, certain fracture patterns in the 3-column classification scheme generally correlated with surgical approaches. This novel classification system may be used as a supplement to the traditional Judet-Letournel classification system.Clinical RelevanceThe 3-column concept of the acetabulum proposed in this study is helpful to master acetabular fractures for less experienced surgeons. The novel classification system could assist with acetabular fracture diagnosis and the choice of surgical approaches.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.