• R Vijayanagar, D Bognolo, P Eckstein, D Jeffery, E Harrison, J Kerpchar, E Willard, and R Musunuru.
• Section of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Tampa General Hospital, Florida.
• J Cardiovasc Surg. 1987 Sep 1; 28 (5): 576-80.

AbstractQuestions regarding the relative safety and efficacy of internal mammary artery (IMA) grafts versus saphenous vein grafts (SVG) in patients with left main coronary artery disease (LMCAD) have not been specifically addressed in the literature. To elucidate this point, we analyzed 196 patients with LMCAD who underwent myocardial revascularization between January 1975 and December 1981, 98 by IMA and SVG and 98 by SVG, IMA was used most often to bypass the left anterior descending (LAD). Chi Square and "t" tests were performed on all demographic, cardiac and operative data comparing IMA to SVG. All results were non-significant, indicating that the two groups were comparable. Anginal pattern was progressive or unstable in 93%. IMA was used in 4 patients who were on intra-aortic balloon pump. The mean number bypass grafts per patient was 3.1. Postoperative complications were comparable for both groups, including early and late myocardial infarction. Overall operative mortality was 2.6%. Results of a survival analysis indicated no significant difference in the mortality rates of patients operated on by SVG versus IMA-SVG. Cumulative mortality rates at a mean followup of 20.5 months were 12.2% for SVG and 7.1% for IMA patients. Significant mortality risk factors were ejection fraction less than 55% (p less than 0.05); and perioperative myocardial infarction (p less than 0.001). Twenty-five patients with recurrent chest pain underwent repeat cardiac catheterization. This revealed 10 of 10 patent IMA grafts, 6 of 8 single patent SVG to LAD and 6 of 9 patent sequential vein grafts to the diagonal and LAD arteries.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

18 keywords...

hide…