-
- Minoru Yamada and Hidenori Arai.
- Graduate School of Comprehensive Human Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tokyo, Japan; National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Aichi, Japan. Electronic address: m-yamada@human.tsukuba.ac.jp.
- J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2018 Dec 1; 19 (12): 1099-1103.
ObjectiveTo determine the prevalence of social frailty and its relation to incident disability and mortality in community-dwelling Japanese older adults.DesignProspective cohort study.Setting And Participants6603 community-dwelling adults aged 65 years and older who were living independently in a city in Shiga prefecture in 2011.OutcomesThe outcomes were incident disability and mortality. We defined incident disability using new long-term care insurance (LTCI) service requirement certifications, and the follow-up period was 6 years after the mailed survey.MeasurementsThe 4-item social frailty screening questionnaire was developed and included general resources, social resources, social behavior, and fulfillment of basic social needs. We categorized the respondents into 3 groups based on the level of social frailty. Additionally, we assessed physical/psychological frailty by the frailty screening index and other demographic variables.ResultsThe prevalences of social frailty, social prefrailty, and social robust were 18.0%, 32.1%, and 50.0%, respectively. During the 6-year follow-up period, 28.1% of those with social robust, 36.9% of those with social prefrailty, and 48.5% of those with social frailty died or experienced incident disability. Those with social prefrailty [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 1.28, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.16-1.41] and social frailty (adjusted HR 1.71, 95% CI 1.54-1.90) had significantly elevated risks for incident disability and mortality based on multivariate analyses that used social robust as the reference. Furthermore, the combination of social frailty and physical/psychological frailty is more likely to result in incident disability and mortality compared to social frailty or physical/psychological frailty alone.Conclusions/ImplicationsCommunity-dwelling older adults with both social frailty and physical/psychological frailty are at higher risk of death or disability over 6 years than are older adults with only one type of frailty or no frailty. Screening and preventive measures for social frailty are suggested for healthy aging.Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.