• Gaceta sanitaria · Jul 1999

    [Inappropriate utilization of pediatric hospitalization. Validation of the pediatric appropriateness evaluation protocol Spanish version].

    • C Casanova Matutano, P Gascón Romero, F Calvo Rigual, M Tomás Vila, J M Paricio Talayero, L Blasco González, and S Peiró.
    • Servicio de Pediatría, Hospital de Sagunto, Puerto de Sagunto, Valencia, 46520, España.
    • Gac Sanit. 1999 Jul 1; 13 (4): 303-11.

    ObjectiveTo validate the Spanish version of the Pediatric Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol (PAEP).MethodsThe protocol was applied by two independent reviewers to a sample of 104 clinical records of pediatric patients (age 6 months to 14 years) admitted to a general hospital in the Valentian Community. Reliability was tested by comparing their results. Validity was tested by comparing the results of one reviewer with the judgment of three pediatricians. The following measures were calculated: overall agreement (IO), specific agreement (IE), Cohen's κ, inappropriate use ratio, and, to evaluate the predictive value, sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive value.ResultsInterobserver reliability was high: the IO for admissions was 94.2% and 96.2% for days of care. The IE was 66.7% and 75% respectively, and κ showed values of excellent agreement: 0.77 (95% CI 0.59-0.94) for admissions and 0.83 (95% CI 0.68-0.99) for days of care. Validity was moderate: the IO for admissions was 92.35, and 90.4% for days of care. The IE was 60% and 58.3% respectively, and κ showed values of good agreement: 0.70 (95% CI 0.51-0.90) for admissions and 0.68 (95% CI 0.50-0.86) for days of care. Inappropriate use ratio was 1.13 for admissions and 0.73 for days of care. The sensitivity and specificity were high for admissions (80% and 94% respectively), while sensitivity was lower for days of care (64% and 98%). Regarding the prevalence of inappropriate use of this study, the positive predictive value ranged between 71% and 88%, and the negative predictive value ranged between 97% and 91%.ConclusionsPAEP has a high reliability, moderate validity and good predictive value face to clinical judgment, and it is a useful instrument for assessing the inappropriate utilization of pediatric hospitalization.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.