• Int J Surg · Dec 2007

    Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the preoperative staging of thoracic oesophageal and gastro-oesophageal junction cancer: a prospective study.

    • I E Katsoulis, W L Wong, A K Mattheou, N Damani, J Chambers, and J I Livingstone.
    • Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery Unit, Watford General Hospital, 60 Vicarage Road, Watford, Hertfordshire WD18 0HB, UK. hrkats@yahoo.co.uk
    • Int J Surg. 2007 Dec 1; 5 (6): 399-403.

    BackgroundThe pre-operative staging in oesophageal cancer is often challenging and underestimation of the extent of the disease may lead to unnecessary surgery.AimTo audit the use and assess the value of fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography ((18)F FDG-PET) as a staging tool for thoracic oesophageal and gastro-oesophageal junction (GOJ) cancers in our oncological surgical practice.Patients And MethodsOver a 3 year period, between 2002 and 2004, 134 patients with thoracic oesophageal or GOJ cancer were referred to our unit for treatment. The standard preoperative staging investigation in all cases was CT (thorax, abdomen and pelvis). A preoperative FDG-PET scan was further requested in 22 patients. The case notes of all the patients that underwent a FDG-PET scan were reviewed and compared with the preoperative imaging, the operative findings and the histopathology of the resected tumours.ResultsEighteen men and 4 women with a median age of 65 (range 43-79) years were studied. After FDG-PET, 13 out of 22 patients (59%) were deemed suitable for tumour resection. Twelve of the 13 patients were fit to undergo surgery. At laparotomy, 2 of those (17%) were found inoperable due to widespread disease. The sensitivity of CT versus FDG-PET to detect infiltrated lymph nodes was 29% (95% CI: 3-70) versus 71% (95% CI: 29-96) (P=0.0412), whereas both tests had 67% specificity (95% CI: 9-99) in detecting lymph nodes. The sensitivity and the specificity of CT versus FDG-PET to detect distant organ metastases (M1b) were 33% (95% CI: 4-77) and 88% (95% CI: 47-99) versus 50% (95% CI: 6-93) and 100% (95% CI: 69-100), respectively (P>0.05). The FDG-PET regarding the N and M status differed from the CT in 11 patients and led to modification of the planned management in 5 of them.ConclusionsFDG-PET is more accurate than CT in defining N and M status. It can result in a reduction of unnecessary surgery in a significant number of patients. The combined PET-CT scan as a single imaging modality is expected to further improve diagnostic accuracy of FDG-PET.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…