• Eur J Phys Rehabil Med · Oct 2019

    Randomized Controlled Trial

    Effects of a task-based biofeedback training program on improving sensorimotor function in neuropathic hands in diabetic patients: a randomized controlled trial.

    • Li-Chieh Kuo, Chien-Ju Yang, Cheng-Feng Lin, I-Ming Jou, Yi-Ching Yang, Chien-Hsien Yeh, Chih-Chun Lin, and Hsiu-Yun Hsu.
    • Department of Occupational Therapy, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.
    • Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2019 Oct 1; 55 (5): 618-626.

    BackgroundSymptoms of diabetic hands have been gradually elucidated, however the interventions for these hand problems are typically underemphasized. Few studies have discussed intervention effects on sensorimotor problems in hands, which prevent diabetic patients from executing their daily routines and lower their quality of life (QoL).AimThis study has investigated the effects of task-based biofeedback training compared with home-based programs on sensorimotor function and QoL in diabetic patients with neuropathic hands.DesignA single blind randomized controlled trial.SettingOutpatient clinic at a university hospital.PopulationThirty-eight patients with diabetic hand neuropathy whose sensorimotor functions were impaired based on screening with a pinch-holding-up activity (PHUA) test.MethodsParticipants were randomly assigned to either a computerized evaluation and re-education biofeedback (CERB) (N.=20) or a home-based (tendon gliding exercise in conjunction with resistive exercise) (N.=18) group. The primary outcome was sensorimotor control of a hand using the PHUA test. Secondary outcomes included changes in Semmes-Weinstein monofilament, two-point discrimination, the Purdue Pegboard test and a self-reported QoL questionnaire. The measurements were conducted before and after a 6-week treatment program.ResultsThe CERB group significantly improved efficiency in pinch force output during the PHUA test by reducing the percentage of maximum pinch strength (change from 34.5±11.66 to 30.7±10.16%, P=0.001), and there was a statistically significant between-group difference (P=0.00, 95% CI: -12.59 to -3.34, F=9.42). The CERB group showed superior treatment effects as compared to the control group on the two-point discrimination results (P=0.01) as well as the pin insertion subtests in the Purdue pegboard test (P=0.01). The QoL results also revealed significant between-group differences in several items of the Diabetes-39 (P<0.05).ConclusionsThis study showed that a task-based biofeedback training program provides superior benefits for restoration of hand sensorimotor functioning in diabetic patients as compared to a home-based program combining tendon gliding exercise and resistive exercise.Clinical Rehabilitation ImpactUsing task-based biofeedback training as one of the rehabilitation strategies may be an effective approach for restoration of sensory function, precision pinch performance, hand dexterity, and QoL for patients with diabetes-related neuropathy.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…