• J Magn Reson Imaging · Mar 2009

    Comparative Study

    Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of abdominal solid organ and major vessel: comparison of enhancement effect between Gd-EOB-DTPA and Gd-DTPA.

    • Tsutomu Tamada, Katsuyoshi Ito, Teruki Sone, Akira Yamamoto, Koji Yoshida, Koki Kakuba, Daigo Tanimoto, Hiroki Higashi, and Takenori Yamashita.
    • Department of Radiology, Kawasaki Medical School, Okayama, Japan. ttamada@med.kawasaki-m.ac.jp
    • J Magn Reson Imaging. 2009 Mar 1; 29 (3): 636-40.

    PurposeTo evaluate the differences in enhancement of the abdominal solid organ and the major vessel on dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) obtained with gadolinium ethoxybenzyldiethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA: EOB) and gadolinium diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (Gd-DTPA) in the same patients.Materials And MethodsA total of 13 healthy volunteers underwent repeat assessments of abdominal MR examinations with DCE-MRI using either Gd-DTPA at a dose of 0.1 mmol/kg body weight or EOB at a dose of 0.025 mmol/kg body weight. DCE images were obtained at precontrast injection and in the arterial phase (AP: 25 seconds), portal phase (PP: 70 seconds), and equilibrium phase (EP: 3 minutes). The signal intensities (SIs) of liver at AP, PP, and EP; the SIs of spleen, renal cortex, renal medulla, pancreas, adrenal gland, aorta at AP; and the SIs of portal vein and inferior vena cava (IVC) at PP were defined using region-of-interest measurements, and were used for calculation of signal intensity ratio (SIR).ResultsThe mean SIRs of liver (0.195+/-0.140), spleen (1.35+/-0.353), renal cortex (1.58+/-0.517), renal medulla (0.548+/-0.259), pancreas (0.540+/-0.183), adrenal gland (1.04+/-0.405), and aorta (2.44+/-0.648) at AP as well as the mean SIRs of portal vein (1.85+/-0.477) and IVC (1.16+/-0.187) at PP in the EOB images were significantly lower than those (0.337+/-0.200, 1.99+/-0.443, 2.01+/-0.474, 0.742+/-0.336, 0.771+/-0.227, 1.26+/-0.442, 3.22+/-1.20, 2.73+/-0.429, and 1.68+/-0.366, respectively) in the Gd-DTPA images (P<0.05 each). There was no significant difference in mean SIR of liver at PP between EOB (0.529+/-0.124) and Gd-DTPA (0.564+/-0.139). Conversely, the mean SIR of liver at EP was significantly higher with EOB (0.576+/-0.167) than with Gd-DTPA (0.396+/-0.093) (P<0.001).ConclusionLower arterial vascular and parenchymal enhancement with Gd-EOB, as compared with Gd-DTPA, may require reassessment of its dose, despite the higher late venous phase liver parenchymal enhancement.Copyright (c) 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…