• Int. J. Clin. Pract. · Sep 2021

    The efficacy and reliability of VI-RADS in determining candidates for repeated transurethral resection in patients with high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer.

    • Mustafa Erkoc, Alper Otunctemur, Muammer Bozkurt, Osman Can, Hasan Anil Atalay, Huseyin Besiroglu, Eyyup Danis, and Recep Burak Degirmentepe.
    • Department of Urology, Basaksehir Cam and Sakura City Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
    • Int. J. Clin. Pract. 2021 Sep 1; 75 (9): e14584.

    ObjectiveOur study aims to evaluate the efficiency and reliability of Vesical Imaging Reporting Data System (VI-RADS) in prospectively identifying the patients to undergo RE-TURBT in the management of patients with high-risk non-muscle invasive Bladder Cancer(HR-NMIBC).The secondary objective was to evaluate the performance of the VI-RADS scoring system in differentiating between muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) and non-muscle invasive bladder cancer(NMIBC) prospectively.MethodsThe study included 330 patients who underwent transurethral resection of bladder tumour(TURBT) for Bladder Cancer (BC) in our clinic. All patients underwent multiparametric-magnetic resonance imaging (Mp-MRI) before the operation and VI-RADS scoring was administered. The cut-off value of VI-RADS was accepted as three and above. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated for the differentiation between NMIBC and MIBC distinction in all patients. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to evaluate the performance of the VI-RADS scoring system. In the second phase of the study, patients with MIBC and low-risk NMIBC (LR-NMBIC) were excluded and 158 patients with HR-NMIBC were included, and their sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV values were measured. ROC analysis was performed.ResultsIn all patients, sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV values of the VI-RADS scoring in the differentiation of MIBC and NMIBC were 91.3, 91.8, 81.7 and 96.3 respectively. The AUC value was 0.934 (95%CI: 0.903-0.964). Sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV values were found to be 87, 91.8, 74.1, 95.2 in the evaluation specifically made for patients with HR-NMIBC. The AUC value was 0.900 (95% CI:0.843-0.957). Inter-reader agreement was excellent (Ƙ = 0.90, 95% CI:0.71-0.95).ConclusionsThe VI-RADS scoring system is an effective and reliable method in determining the patients who will undergo RE-TURBT and in differentiating MIBC and NMIBC.© 2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.