• Alexandra Stoehr, Dominik Nann, Annette Staebler, Ernst Oberlechner, S Y Brucker, and Cornelia Bachmann.
• Department für Frauengesundheit, Eberhard Karls Universitat Tubingen, Tübingen, Germany.
• Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 2019 Oct 1; 300 (4): 1029-1043.

PurposeRare minimal deviation adenocarcinoma (MDA) diagnosed postoperatively as incidental finding of a suspicious cervical lesion at laparoscopy, emphasizing it represents a diagnostic challenge mimicking both benign and malignant cervical lesions with often overlapping imaging characteristics-case report and literature review.Case Presentation35-year-old Gravida with primary infertility presented with a suspicious cervical lesion and complained about menorrhagia, hyper-/dysmenorrhea. Clinical examination was unremarkable, transvaginal scan presented a 42 × 38 × 28 mm sized cervical lesion (i.e. fibroid) without hypervascularization. Unexpectedly, the diagnosis of minimal deviation adenocarcinoma in tissue sample taken from suspicious cervical lesion at laparoscopy was revealed in final pathological report. According to suspected early stage of MDA a radical abdominal hysterectomy (PIVER III/IV), bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, omentectomy, pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy was scheduled. Final histology report confirmed: "MDA", G2, FIGO pT1b1, pN0 (0/23 LN) L0 V0 Pn0 R0.ResultsUltrasonography may indicate MDA throughout the examination of vascularization/echogenicity with possibility of mimicking benign lesions with similar characteristics. Magnetic resonance imaging shows no pathognomonic signs for MDA. Subsequently, a review of literature was conducted and main factors affecting the prognosis of MDA considering diagnostic tools, clinical stage, histopathological results and surgical protocols were analyzed.ConclusionsMinimal deviation adenocarcinoma represents one of rare cervical adenocarcinomas without HPV-association. While it is crucial to differentiate benign from malignant lesions in this subtype, imaging characteristics often overlap and may not provide a specific diagnosis. Therefore, it should be considered in suspicious multicystic cervical lesions and inconclusive PAP-smear. Definitive diagnosis of this subtype should be based on cervical biopsy.

21 keywords...

hide…