• Rheumatology · Jul 2011

    Rasch analysis of Dutch-translated version of the Foot Impact Scale for rheumatoid arthritis.

    • James Woodburn, Thea P M Vliet Vlieland, Marike van der Leeden, and Martijn P M Steultjens.
    • 1Musculoskeletal and Neurological Rehabilitation Research Group, Institute for Applied Health Research, School of Health, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK. jim.woodburn@gcu.ac.uk
    • Rheumatology (Oxford). 2011 Jul 1; 50 (7): 1315-9.

    ObjectiveTo translate the foot impact scale for RA (FIS-RA) to the dutch target language and to evaluate its internal construct validity using rasch analysis.MethodsForward and backward translations of the original English version of the FIS-RA scale, combined with synthesis techniques and expert committee review, were undertaken to produce a final Dutch version with two subscales for impairment/footwear (FIS-RA(IF)) and activity/participation (FIS-RA(AP)). The pre-final version was field tested in RA patients to investigate face and content validity. FIS-RA questionnaires were completed by 207 Dutch RA patients. Rasch analysis tested the data for overall fit to the model, item and person fit, unidimensionality, differential item function (DIF) by age, gender and disease duration, targeting, reliability and local response dependency. Item deletion and re-analysis were planned, where Rasch model assumptions were violated.ResultsThe FIS-RA(IF) (P < 0.0001) and FIS-RA(AP) (P < 0.0001) subscales did not fit the overall Rasch model. Misfitting items, DIF by age, gender and disease duration, and local response dependency were observed in both subscales. Item thresholds showed good coverage over both scales although a floor effect was observed for the FIS-RA(AP) subscale. The person separation index was 0.81 and 0.92 for the FIS-RA(IF) and FIS-RA(AP) subscales, respectively. Both subscales were not unidimensional. Item deletion and repeat Rasch analysis produced two subscales that fitted the Rasch model and were unidimensional.ConclusionA Dutch language version of the FIS-RA questionnaire was successfully developed using Rasch analysis. Subscales for impairment/footwear and activity/participation showed good construct validity and were unidimensional.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,624,503 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.