• Alexander Nast, Ricardo Erdmann, Delano Pathirana, and Berthold Rzany.
• Division of Evidence Based Medicine, Klinik für Dermatology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany. alexander.nast@charite.de
• J Eval Clin Pract. 2008 Oct 1; 14 (5): 803-6.

RationaleEvidence-based guidelines can make a substantial contribution to improving medical care. However, it is important to ensure that guidelines are: (1) developed in areas in which they are needed the most; and (2) translated effectively into everyday clinical practice.ObjectivesTo evaluate the need for guidelines in the treatment of psoriasis vulgaris, the success of the dissemination activities undertaken to date, and the potential benefits of educational interventions in encouraging guideline compliance.MethodsAll dermatologists working in the Berlin-Brandenburg region of Germany were invited to attend a workshop on the psoriasis treatment guidelines. Participants could take part in a survey examining the general need for psoriasis guidelines and the success of previous dissemination activities.ResultsA total of 42% of survey participants had not received a copy of the guidelines prior to the workshop. Of those who had received a copy, only 15% had studied the guidelines in detail. In total, 76% of survey participants felt that physicians' low levels of confidence in administering systemic treatments had resulted in these treatment options being used less frequently than they should. Seventy-nine per cent of survey participants believed that the guidelines would be helpful in improving physicians' confidence and ultimately lead to an increased use of systemic treatments.ConclusionThe results of the present study indicate that there is a great need for guidelines on the treatment of psoriasis vulgaris in Germany, especially in light of dermatologists' low levels of confidence administering systemic treatments. Strategies for broad dissemination are essential for proper guideline implementation.

34 keywords...

hide…