• Yunhee Choi, Chi Heon Kim, John M Rhee, Calvin C Kuo, Urim Lee, Sung Bae Park, Chang-Hyun Lee, Seung Heon Yang, Kyoung-Tae Kim, and Chun Kee Chung.
• Medical Research Collaborating Center, Seoul National University Hospital, 101 Daehak-Ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul 03080, South Korea.
• J Clin Neurosci. 2020 Feb 1; 72: 124-129.

ObjectiveFull-endoscopic lumbar discectomy (FELD) is a minimally invasive surgical option for recurrent lumbar disc herniation (LDH). Nonetheless, patients' clinical outcomes may be poorer after surgery for recurrent LDH than for primary LDH. Therefore, we compared patients' longitudinal clinical outcomes after FELD for recurrent LDH or primary LDH.MethodsThe medical records of patients who underwent FELD for primary LDH (group A) or recurrent LDH (group B) were retrospectively reviewed. The inclusion criteria were: 1) single-level LDH or recurrent LDH at L4-5 or L5-S1, 2) age ≤60 years, 3) previous open discectomy (group B), and 4) ≥6 months of follow-up. In total, 244 patients (group A, 211; group B, 33) were included. Clinical outcomes (Oswestry Disability Index [ODI]; visual analogue pain score for the back and leg [VAS-B] and [VAS-L]) over 24 months of follow-up were compared between groups with a linear mixed-effects model.ResultsAll clinical outcomes significantly improved from pre-operation to 3 months postoperatively (p < 0.01), and the improvement was maintained for 24 months postoperatively in both groups. The clinical outcomes of groups A and B were not significantly different during 24 months follow-up (ODI, p = 0.94; VAS-B, p = 0.11; and VAS-L, p = 0.48). The reoperation rate was 3.3% in group A and 3.0% in group B, but the overall complication rate was higher in group B (9.8%) than in group A (6.6%).ConclusionThe longitudinal clinical outcomes after FELD for recurrent LDH may not be poor as feared. However, the higher complication rate in patients undergoing FELD for recurrent LDH should be noted.Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

37 keywords...

hide…