• Int. J. Cancer · Dec 2014

    Anthropometric measures and bladder cancer risk: a prospective study in the EPIC cohort.

    • Nina Roswall, Heinz Freisling, H B Bueno-de-Mesquita, Martine Ros, Jane Christensen, Kim Overvad, Marie-Christine Boutron-Ruault, Gianluca Severi, Guy Fagherazzi, Jenny Chang-Claude, Rudolf Kaaks, Annika Steffen, Heiner Boeing, Marcial Argüelles, Antonio Agudo, María-José Sánchez, Maria-Dolores Chirlaque, Barricarte GurreaAurelioA, Pilar Amiano, Nick Wareham, Kay-Tee Khaw, Kathryn Erica Bradbury, Antonia Trichopoulou, Helen-Maria Papatesta, Dimitrios Trichopoulos, Domenico Palli, Valeria Pala, Rosario Tumino, Carlotta Sacerdote, Amalia Mattiello, Petra H Peeters, Roy Ehrnström, Paul Brennan, Pietro Ferrari, Börje Ljungberg, Teresa Norat, Marc Gunter, Elio Riboli, Elisabete Weiderpass, and Jytte Halkjaer.
    • Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Copenhagen, Denmark.
    • Int. J. Cancer. 2014 Dec 15; 135 (12): 2918-29.

    AbstractAnthropometric measures have been related to risk of several cancers. For bladder cancer, however, evidence is sparse. Comparability of existing studies is hampered by use of different obesity-measures, inadequate control for smoking, and few female cases. This study examined associations between height, weight, waist and hip circumference, waist-hip ratio, waist-height ratio, body mass index (BMI), recalled weight at age 20 and bladder cancer, and investigated effect modification by age, tumor aggressiveness and smoking. The study was conducted in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition cohort, in 390,878 participants. Associations were calculated using Cox Proportional Hazards Models. During follow-up, 1,391 bladder cancers (1,018 male; 373 female) occurred. Height was unrelated to bladder cancer in both genders. We found a small but significant positive association with weight [1.04 (1.01-1.07) per 5 kilo], BMI [1.05 (1.02-1.08) per 2 units], waist circumference [1.04 (1.01-1.08) per 5 cm], waist-hip ratio (1.07 (1.02-1.13) per 0.05 unit] and waist-height ratio [1.07 (1.01-1.13) per 0.05 unit] in men. Stratification by smoking status confined associations in men to former smokers. In never smokers, we found no significant associations, suggesting residual confounding by smoking. Results did not differ with tumor aggressiveness and age. Residual analyses on BMI/waist circumference showed a significantly higher disease risk with BMI in men (p = 0.01), but no association with waist circumference. In conclusion, in this large study, height was unrelated to bladder cancer, whereas overweight was associated with a slightly higher bladder cancer risk in men. This association may, however, be distorted by residual confounding by smoking.© 2014 UICC.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…