• Na Wu, Changjiang Xue, Shiwen Yu, and Qiao Ye.
• Department of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology, Clinical Center for Interstitial Lung Diseases, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
• Respirology. 2020 May 1; 25 (5): 518-524.

Background And ObjectiveWe recently noted a dramatic increase in the number of patients with accelerated silicosis associated with exposure to artificial stone dust. Therefore, the natural history of artificial stone-associated silicosis was compared with that of natural stone-associated silicosis.MethodsA total of 18 patients with artificial stone-associated silicosis and 63 with natural stone-associated silicosis were diagnosed sequentially in 2018 and followed up for a period of 6-12 months. Data were collected from clinical charts.ResultsThe median duration of exposure prior to onset of symptoms of silicosis was shorter for patients who had been exposed to artificial stone dust (6.4 vs 29.3 years, P < 0.01). Four of the 18 patients experienced rapid deterioration in lung function over the follow-up period, with declines in pre-bronchodilator FVC of 587 (210-960) mL/year and FEV1 of 625 (360-860) mL/year. GGO, PMF, emphysema and pulmonary artery widening were more frequently observed on computed tomography scans of patients with artificial stone-associated silicosis than of those with natural stone-associated silicosis. Approximately 38.9% of the patients with artificial stone-associated silicosis were lung transplant candidates and 27.8% died, both rates being significantly higher than in patients with natural stone-associated silicosis (3.2% and 0%, both P < 0.01).ConclusionCompared to natural stone-associated silicosis, artificial stone-associated silicosis was characterized by short latency, rapid radiological progression, accelerated decline in lung function and high mortality.© 2019 The Authors. Respirology published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Asian Pacific Society of Respirology.

30 keywords...

hide…