• Surg J R Coll Surg E · Jun 2011

    Review

    Changing to endovenous treatment for varicose veins: how much more evidence is needed?

    • Kieran D McBride.
    • Queen Margaret Hospital, Dunfermline, NHS Fife, Scotland, UK. kdmcbride@blueyonder.co.uk
    • Surg J R Coll Surg E. 2011 Jun 1; 9 (3): 150-9.

    AbstractSurgical ligation and stripping of varicose veins has been the accepted treatment for almost a century but within the last decade this has been challenged by endovenous thermal and chemical ablation methods. Surgery is not without significant complications including paraesthesia and has reflux recurrence rates of up to 54% at five years, even though it has been shown to provide significant health-related quality of life benefits cost-effectively. Ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy, endovenous laser ablation and radiofrequency ablation are all consistently proving to be at least as beneficial as surgery, without the same complications and with less post-procedure morbidity and more rapid recovery. This article presents a review of the latest published evidence and comparative analysis of vein surgery and it's alternatives. Endovenous treatment under local anaesthesia in a clinic room or office-based setting is now being recognized internationally as an acceptable standard for dedicated venous practice in a cost-effective environment. Although more long-term comparative trials of these innovative methods compared with surgery are desirable, many centres are now conducting trials testing the latest endovenous device technologies with each other to support the development of contemporary pathways of care. Patients are entitled to a range of treatment strategies, particularly when complex and recurrent venous disease has such unacceptably high surgical complication and recurrence rates compared to endovenous alternatives. There is questionable logic in procrastinating until there is more convincing evidence. Now is the time for vascular surgeons to enhance their ultrasound skills and future-proof their venous practice for the benefits of patients and institutions.Copyright © 2010 Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh (Scottish charity number SC005317) and Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.