• Mukesh Tripathi, Nilay Tripathi, and Mamta Pandey.
• From the *Department of Anesthesiology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow; †Ursila District Hospital, Kanpur; ‡Emergency Medicine, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, India.
• A A Case Rep. 2017 Mar 1; 8 (5): 122-125.

AbstractModern anesthesia workstations display capnography, flow-time, and pressure-time waveforms in real time. We observed that at certain ventilator settings (10 breaths/min) on Dräger workstations, the expiratory phase of the capnograph overlaps both the inspiratory and the expiratory phases of ventilation. This discrepancy disappears at respiratory rates of 16 breaths/min. This synchronous respiratory monitoring display at respiratory rates 16 breaths/min is not physiologically correct, because it implies a synchronization of waveforms that is not actually present. This again becomes asynchronous once the respiratory rate is increased to >18 breaths/min. Such an artifact may not affect the patient's safety in most cases but may mislead clinicians when synchrony between flow/pressure and capnography is needed for diagnostic purposes. We wish to share this discrepancy with clinicians and notify the manufacturer so that potential solutions may be found.

14 keywords...

hide…