• C Neuerburg, K Heberer, and J Heberer.
• Klinik für Allgemeine, Unfall-, Hand- und Plastische Chirurgie, Osteologisches Schwerpunktzentrum (DVO), Klinikum der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Campus Innenstadt, Nußbaumstr. 20, 80336, München, Deutschland. carl.neuerburg@med.uni-muenchen.de.
• Unfallchirurg. 2015 Nov 1; 118 (11): 938-43.

AbstractThrough a more consistent diagnostics and treatment of osteoporosis, subsequent fractures and associated complications could be reduced in aged patients. Whereas anticoagulants are now standard in the treatment of fractures of the lower extremities to prevent thromboembolic complications in orthopedic surgery and an omission of anticoagulation can be regarded as medical malpractice, the management of osteoporosis following such fractures is very frequently disregarded. Although guidelines for osteoporosis, such as those from the governing body on osteology (Dachverband Osteologie, DVO) from 2014 are not legally binding as such, the breach of this standard of care can constitute a breach of medical obligation by the physician. The omission of osteoporosis diagnostics and initiation of treatment despite appropriate findings after fractures in aged patients, could represent a diagnostic assessment error and severe malpractice in the legal sense. In this case, evidence of a serious malpractice could be associated with civil, criminal and professional claims which could be linked with relevant legal consequences. Regardless of the legal consequences for omission of osteoporosis management following multiple fractures in aged patients, the management of osteoporosis should be an integral component in the treatment of these patients in the future.

18 keywords...

hide…