• Eur. J. Cancer · Jul 2017

    Multicenter Study

    Metastatic chromophobe renal cell carcinoma treated with targeted therapies: A Renal Cross Channel Group study.

    • Emeline Colomba, Gwénaël Le Teuff, Tim Eisen, Grant D Stewart, Kate Fife, James Larkin, Andrea Biondo, Lisa Pickering, Anandagopal Srinivasan, Helen Boyle, Lisa Derosa, Cora N Sternberg, Federica Recine, Christy Ralph, Carolina Saldana, Philippe Barthélémy, Jean Christophe Bernhard, Howard Gurney, Gregory Verhoest, Elodie Vauleon, Pierre Bigot, Julien Berger, Christian Pfister, Gwenaelle Gravis, Jean-Michel Rodier, Stéphane Culine, Armelle Caty, Frederic Rolland, Franck Priou, Bernard Escudier, and Laurence Albiges.
    • Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France.
    • Eur. J. Cancer. 2017 Jul 1; 80: 55-62.

    BackgroundTreatment of non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC) remains controversial despite several recent prospective studies of targeted therapies (TT). Often Vascular Endothelial growth Factor (VEGF) and Mammalian Target of Rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors are used, extrapolating the data from use of these agents in clear cell RCC.MethodsWe performed a retrospective data analysis within the Renal Cross Channel Group to determine metastatic chromophobe RCC (mChRCC) outcomes in the TT era. The end-points were overall response, overall survival (OS) and time to treatment failure (TTF). The two latter were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.Results91 mChRCC patients from 26 centres were included. Median follow-up from the date of first metastasis was 6.1 years (range: 0-13.9). Median OS was 37.9 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 21.4-46.8) from the diagnosis of metastatic disease. Among the 61 patients who received TT, 50 (82%) were treated with anti-angiogenic (AA) and 11 with mTOR inhibitors. Median TTF and OS in patients receiving a first line of AA was 8.7 months (95% CI: 5.2-10.9) and 22.9 months (95% CI: 17.8-49.2) versus 1.9 months (95% CI: 1.0-6.0) and 3.2 months (95% CI: 2.3-not evaluable) with mTOR inhibitors, respectively. A stratified log-rank test was used to compare AA and mTOR inhibitors TT, while controlling the effect of the International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium risk group and no significant difference between AA and mTOR inhibitors was observed for TTF (p = 0.26) or for OS (p = 0.55).ConclusionWe report the largest retrospective cohort of patients with mChRCC treated with TT and no significant difference between AA and mTOR inhibitors was observed for TTF and OS.Copyright © 2017. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.