• Gajal Lakhe, Hari Poudel, and Krishna Murari Adhikari.
• Department of Anaesthesia, Manipal Teaching Hospital, Pokhara, Nepal.
• J Nepal Health Res Counc. 2020 Jan 21; 17 (4): 516-520.

BackgroundThe screening tests used for pre-operative evaluation of airway to predict difficult laryngoscopy and intubation have variable diagnostic accuracy. The unanticipated poor laryngeal view is gold standard for defining difficult intubation. We aimed to find out the prevalence of difficult laryngoscopy and intubation, which airway parameter better predicts difficult intubation and whether difficult laryngoscopy is associated with difficult intubation or not.MethodsThis analytic cross sectional study was conducted in 665 ASA I/II adult patients, aged 18-65, without obvious airway pathology undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia. The pre-operative screening tests included mouth opening, modified mallampatti, ratio of height to thyromental distance, sternomentaldistance and upper lip bite test. Cormack-Lehane grade III/ IV was defined as difficult laryngoscopy and potentially difficult intubation. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, accuracy and area under curve at 95% confidence interval was calculated for all five screening tests.ResultsThe prevalence of difficult laryngoscopy and intubation was 6.6% (44 cases). The upper lip bite test because of its highest specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, accuracy and area under curve (99.7%; 93.9%; 99.7%; 95.2%; 85.1% respectively) with moderate level of sensitivity (70.5%) was better predictor of difficult intubation than other tests. The difficult laryngoscopy was associated with difficult intubation (p=0.00).ConclusionsThe prevalence of difficult laryngoscopy and intubation was 6.6%.The upper lip bite test was a better predictor of difficult intubation and there was a significant association of difficult laryngoscopy with difficult intubation.

26 keywords...

hide…