• Encephale · Aug 2016

    [Validation of the French version of the "Beliefs About Voices Questionnaire-Revised" (BAVQ-R)].

    • A Zanello and M Badan Bâ.
    • HUG, département de santé mentale et de psychiatrie, CAPPI Pâquis, rue de Lausanne, 67, 1202 Genève, Suisse. Electronic address: adriano.zanello@hcuge.ch.
    • Encephale. 2016 Aug 1; 42 (4): 320-4.

    IntroductionThe BAVQ-R explores the beliefs and reactions that "voice hearers" have about their voices. Recently, the BAVQ-R was translated into French, but little is known regarding its validity and reliability. Thus, the aim of this study was to examine further the psychometric characteristics of the BAVQ-R French version.MethodSeventy-six adult outpatients participated in the study. In addition to the BAVQ-R, patients were administered a psychiatric symptoms severity interview, and self-esteem and quality of life questionnaires. Then, the BAVQ-R was again completed six weeks later after the seven sessions of brief group cognitive behavioral therapy: the Voices Group.ResultsThe BAVQ-R was well accepted and was completed in less than 10minutes. All items presented floor and ceiling effects. For 15 items, item-total correlations were inferior to 0.30. Internal consistency was 0.83 for the global score, 0.83 for the malevolence, 0.81 for the benevolence, 0.64 for the omnipotence, 0.82 for the resistance and 0.77 for the engagement. The temporal stability was superior to 0.70, except for the omnipotence (0.65). Regarding, the construct validity, on the one hand malevolence, omnipotence and resistance were correlated (0.56≤r≤0.64; P<0.001) and on the other hand benevolence and engagement (r=0.62; P<0.001). Regarding convergent validity significant correlations were found between malevolence, omnipotence resistance and severity of anxio-depressive symptoms, negative self-esteem (0.40≤r≤0.52; P<0.001). The BAVQ-R allows discriminating neither between psychotic and non-psychotic patients (Mann-Whitney, all P>0.05) nor between groups established on the basis of the voice sources (Kruskal-Wallis, all P>0.05). Moreover, the BAVQ-R does not seem to be sensitive to change: no difference was observed after Voices Group intervention (Mann-Whitney, all P>0.05). Sociodemographic variables are not related to BAVQ-R.DiscussionThe French version of the BAVQ-R has sufficiently adequate psychometric characteristics to be used in a clinical setting. However, floor and ceiling effects suggest a lack of sensitivity of the items. Psychometric characteristics of the BAVQ-R could be improved by selecting items and extending the Likert scale to score them.Copyright © 2016 L’Encéphale, Paris. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.