-
Respiratory medicine · Jun 2016
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter StudyLong-term safety of glycopyrrolate: A randomized study in patients with moderate-to-severe COPD (GEM3).
- Donald A Mahler, Alex H Gifford, Aditi Satti, Nicola Jessop, Joerg H Eckert, Peter D'Andrea, Fernando Mota, and Rudrani Banerjee.
- Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH 03755, USA; Valley Regional Hospital, Claremont, NH 03743, USA. Electronic address: mahlerdonald@gmail.com.
- Respir Med. 2016 Jun 1; 115: 39-45.
BackgroundChronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is one of the leading causes of death in the United States. Long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMAs) are a class of medications used as maintenance therapy for COPD. The GEM3 (Glycopyrrolate Effect on syMptoms and lung function) study assessed the long-term safety and efficacy of a LAMA, glycopyrrolate (GLY) 15.6 μg twice daily (b.i.d.), compared with an approved long-acting β2-agonist (LABA), indacaterol (IND) 75 μg once daily (q.d.) in patients with stable, symptomatic COPD with moderate-to-severe airflow limitation.MethodsThis 52-week, multicenter, double-blind, parallel-group study randomized patients (1:1) of the United States to receive GLY 15.6 μg b.i.d. or IND 75 μg q.d. both delivered via the Neohaler(®) device. The primary objective was to assess the safety and tolerability in terms of adverse event (AE) reporting rates over 52 weeks. Safety was also determined by evaluating multiple secondary endpoints, including vital signs, electrocardiograms (ECGs), and time to first moderate or severe exacerbation. Efficacy-related secondary endpoints included pre-dose forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) and forced vital capacity (FVC).ResultsOf the 511 randomized patients (GLY, n = 254; IND, n = 257), 81.6% completed the study. The overall incidences of AEs (GLY, 77.3%; IND, 77.0%) and serious AEs (GLY, 13.1%; IND, 13.3%) were comparable between the groups. The incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events was low and comparable between the groups. No clinically relevant differences for vital signs or ECG parameters were observed between the treatment groups. The three sudden deaths reported within 30 days of the treatment (GLY, n = 2; IND, n = 1) were adjudicated as unrelated to the study medication. In terms of efficacy, GLY 15.6 μg b.i.d. showed improvements in pre-dose FEV1 and FVC from baseline, which was comparable to those with IND 75 μg q.d., with no statistically significant differences. No significant differences were observed between the treatment groups in the time to first moderate or severe COPD exacerbation.ConclusionGLY 15.6 μg b.i.d. showed a long-term safety profile comparable to that of IND 75 μg q.d. and provided rapid and sustained bronchodilation over 52 weeks in patients with COPD with moderate-to-severe airflow limitation.Clinical Trial Registration NumberNCT01697696.Copyright © 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.