• Encephale · Dec 2011

    [A preliminary validation of a new French instrument to assess quality of life for caregivers of patients suffering from schizophrenia].

    • R Richieri, L Boyer, G Reine, A-D Loundou, M-C Simeoni, P Auquier, and C Lançon.
    • Pôle universitaire de psychiatrie adulte, CHU Sainte-Marguerite, Marseille, France. raphaellemarie.richieri@ap-hm.fr
    • Encephale. 2011 Dec 1;37(6):425-32.

    IntroductionSince psychiatric institutions began discharging mentally ill patients into the community, family of patients suffering from schizophrenia are more and more involved in the therapeutic process. The adverse consequences of having a patient suffering from schizophrenia at home are called "burden of care" and have been studied by numerous authors. We were interested in the quality of life of caregivers and its evaluation. This concept represents a more complex, multidimensional approach in which many variables are taken into account. We propose the development of a French self-administered instrument of quality of life for caregivers of individuals with schizophrenia, the caregiver schizophrenia quality of life questionnaire (S-CGQoL).MethodsData were collected through the departments of six psychiatric hospitals in France (n=246). The item reduction and validation processes were based on both item response theory and classical test theory. The study of external validity used the generic Short Form 36 questionnaire. Scores of isolated dimensions were also confronted with caregivers' and patients' demographic data and with patients' clinical data.ResultsThe S-CGQoL contains 25 items describing seven dimensions (psychological and physical well-being; burden and daily routine; relationships with spouse; relationships with psychiatric team; relationships with family; relationships with friends; and material burden). The seven-factor structure accounted for 74.4% of the total variance. Internal consistency was satisfactory; Cronbach's alpha coefficients ranged from 0.79 to 0.92 in the whole sample. The scalability was satisfactory, with INFIT statistics within an acceptable range. In addition, the results confirmed the absence of DIF and supported the invariance of the item calibrations. Acceptability was good. The study of external validity found significant correlation between S-CGQoL index and all SF-36 dimension scores. Certain dimensions of the S-CGQoL are associated with caregivers' characteristics (age, sex, number of children, living situation, and employment status). Moreover, some domains of caregiver's quality of life are dependant on subtype of schizophrenia (paranoid) and symptomatology (positive factor and general psychopathology). We did not find any correlation with negative factor.DiscussionThe content of the S-CGQoL encompasses experiences of great importance to patients and is substantially different from other generic quality of life or burden instruments. In our questionnaire, the focus on the different aspect of the social life permits a precise analytical description of the social dimension that is not assessed as much in other questionnaires.LimitationsThe psychometric properties need to be studied in a wider population. Some parameters of internal validity are missing, such as reproductibility (test-retest reliability) and sensibility to change. The external validity needs to study relationships between S-CGQoL and burden.ConclusionThe S-CGQoL is the first self-administered quality of life questionnaire for caregivers of patients suffering from schizophrenia. It presents satisfactory psychometric properties, which can be completed in five minutes and, therefore, fulfils the goal of brevity sought in research and clinical practice.Copyright © 2011 L’Encéphale, Paris. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…