• Tiina Vilmi-Kerälä, Teemu Koivistoinen, Outi Palomäki, Jukka Uotila, and Ari Palomäki.
• a Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences , University of Tampere , Tampere , Finland.
• Ann. Med. 2017 Dec 1; 49 (8): 636-643.

IntroductionAlthough metabolic syndrome (MetS) is evidently associated with the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD), recently its use has been questioned. We studied the utility of MetS diagnosis when estimating individual CVD risk.MethodsWe compared 27 fertile women with MetS and 27 counterparts without the syndrome, matched pairwise according to well-known risk factors of CVD. Pulse wave velocity (PWV) and central blood pressure (cBP) were determined noninvasively via a SphygmoCor device. Arterial compliance was measured noninvasively with an HDI/PulseWaveTMCR-2000 arterial tonometer.ResultsPWV (7.1 ± 2.5 versus 6.5 ± 1.1 m/s, p = .037), and both systolic (120.9 ± 12.2 versus 111.5 ± 16.0 mmHg, p = .031) and diastolic cBP (81.3 ± 8.5 versus 74.1 ± 11.2 mmHg, p = .035) were higher in the MetS group. Systemic arterial compliance values were lower in both large (15.1 ± 8.0 versus 16.1 ± 4.4 mL/mmHg × 10, p = .034) and small arteries (7.1 ± 2.5 versus 9.3 ± 3.2 mL/mmHg ×100, p = .010) in women with MetS.ConclusionsFertile women with MetS had increased arterial stiffness, as measured by three different methods. Our results highlight the utility of MetS when revealing increased individual CVD risks in fertile-aged women. Key messages Women with MetS have increased arterial stiffness when measured by different methods. MetS is a useful clinical tool to assess increased cardiovascular risk, particularly among fertile-aged women.

25 keywords...

hide…