• Annals of surgery · Nov 2022

    Multicenter Study

    Liver Transplantation as a New Standard of Care in Patients with Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma? Results from an International Benchmark Study.

    • Eva Breuer, Matteo Mueller, Majella B Doyle, Liu Yang, Sarwa Darwish Murad, Imran J Anwar, Shaheed Merani, Ashley Limkemann, Heithem Jeddou, Steven C Kim, Victor López-López, Ahmed Nassar, Frederik J H Hoogwater, Eric Vibert, Michelle L De Oliveira, Daniel Cherqui, Robert J Porte, Joseph F Magliocca, Lutz Fischer, Constantino Fondevila, Krzysztof Zieniewicz, Pablo Ramírez, David P Foley, Karim Boudjema, Austin D Schenk, Alan N Langnas, Stuart Knechtle, Wojciech G Polak, TanerC BurcinCBDepartment of Transplant, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL., William C Chapman, Charles B Rosen, Gregory J Gores, Philipp Dutkowski, Julie K Heimbach, and Pierre-Alain Clavien.
    • Department of Surgery and Transplantation, Swiss HPB Center, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
    • Ann. Surg. 2022 Nov 1; 276 (5): 846853846-853.

    ObjectiveTo define benchmark values for liver transplantation (LT) in patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC) enabling unbiased comparisons.BackgroundTransplantation for PHC is used with reluctance in many centers and even contraindicated in several countries. Although benchmark values for LT are available, there is a lack of specific data on LT performed for PHC.MethodsPHC patients considered for LT after Mayo-like protocol were analyzed in 17 reference centers in 2 continents over the recent 5-year period (2014-2018). The minimum follow-up was 1 year. Benchmark patients were defined as operated at high-volume centers (≥50 overall LT/year) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, with a tumor diameter <3 cm, negative lymph nodes, and with the absence of relevant comorbidities. Benchmark cutoff values were derived from the 75th to 25th percentiles of the median values of all benchmark centers.ResultsOne hundred thirty-four consecutive patients underwent LT after completion of the neoadjuvant treatment. Of those, 89.6% qualified as benchmark cases. Benchmark cutoffs were 90-day mortality ≤5.2%; comprehensive complication index at 1 year of ≤33.7; grade ≥3 complication rates ≤66.7%. These values were better than benchmark values for other indications of LT. Five-year disease-free survival was largely superior compared with a matched group of nodal negative patients undergoing curative liver resection (n=106) (62% vs 32%, P <0.001).ConclusionThis multicenter benchmark study demonstrates that LT offers excellent outcomes with superior oncological results in early stage PHC patients, even in candidates for surgery. This provocative observation should lead to a change in available therapeutic algorithms for PHC.Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.