• Chun-Hwei Tai, Sheng-Che Chou, Chin-Hsien Lin, Wang-Tso Lee, Ruey-Meei Wu, and Sheng-Hong Tseng.
• Department of Neurology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
• World Neurosurg. 2022 Nov 1; 167: e575e582e575-e582.

BackgroundAmong dystonia patients receiving globus pallidus internus (GPi) deep brain stimulation (DBS), long-term outcomes remain to be established. To report the long-term outcomes of GPi DBS in a patient cohort with idiopathic and acquired dystonia.MethodsIn this long-term follow-up cohort, there were 4 patients with idiopathic dystonia and 2 patients with acquired dystonia. The Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale was used to evaluate 6 consecutive patients preoperatively and at 6 months, 12 months, and the last follow-up. The relationship between etiology and clinical improvement was analyzed. Stimulation parameters were evaluated for similarities and differences among these patients.ResultsThe mean follow-up of our cohort was 65.3 months (median 40.5 months). The average improvement in the Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale (mean ± SEM) were 56% ± 7.6, 67% ± 6.8 and 66% ± 9.7 at 6 months, 12 months, and the last follow-up, respectively. There was greater improvement during the long-term follow-up in the 4 patients with idiopathic dystonia than in the 2 patients with acquired dystonia. The 2 most ventral electrodes (contact 0 and 1) were activated in all 11 leads in this cohort. The average stimulation intensity, pulse width and frequency were 2.0 ± 0.24 mA, 252 ± 43 μs, and 99 ± 6.0 Hz, respectively.ConclusionsIsolated dystonia, either monogenic or idiopathic, usually responds better to GPi DBS than to acquired dystonia. Selection of patients by dystonia etiology, accurate placement of DBS leads in GPi targets, and proper stimulation programming are crucial to achieve better long-term outcomes.Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

13 keywords...

hide…