-
Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992) · Jan 2022
Effects of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors on nutritional status in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.
- Kadem Arslan, Emre Yılmaz, and Ercan Aydın.
- Sancaktepe Şehit Prof. Dr. İlhan Varank Training and Research Hospital, Department of Internal Medicine - İstanbul, Turkey.
- Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2022 Jan 1; 68 (11): 157615811576-1581.
ObjectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the effects of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors on nutritional status in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.MethodsThe sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor treatment was initiated in 153 patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction who were symptomatic despite optimal medical treatment and were followed up for 6 months. The Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire scores, New York Heart Association functional class, NT-pro-BNP levels, and nutritional index scores of the patients were evaluated before sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor treatment and at the 6-month follow-up. The nutritional status of the patients was evaluated with the COntrolling NUTritional Status score, Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index, and Prognostic Nutritional Index.ResultsAfter sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor treatment, significant changes were observed in the mean scores of the three different nutritional indexes: COntrolling NUTritional Status (before: 2.76±2.43 vs. after: 1.12±1.23, p<0.001), Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (before: 98.2±9.63 vs. after: 104.4±5.83, p<0.001), and Prognostic Nutritional Index (before: 37.9±4.63 vs. after: 42.9±3.83, p<0.001) scores. A significant decrease in the number of patients with malnutrition was observed according to the COntrolling NUTritional Status (before: 46.4% vs. after: 9.7%, p<0.001), Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (before: 41.8% vs. after: 18.9%, p=0.006), and Prognostic Nutritional Index (before: 36.6% vs. after: 13.7%, p=0.007) scores. A significant functional improvement was observed in patients after sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 treatment: Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire scores (before: 39.2±7.2 vs. after: 20.4±7.4, p<0.001), NT-pro-BNP levels (before: 2989±681 vs. after: 1236±760, p<0.001), and New York Heart Association class (before: class II-III: 95.5%; class IV: 4.5% vs. after: class II-III: 78%; class IV: 0%, p<0.001).ConclusionIn patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction who are symptomatic despite optimal medical treatment, the addition of an sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor to treatment can significantly improve both the nutritional and functional statuses.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.