-
- C Hervé, P Andrivet, M Gaillard, C Kauer, F Roujas, and P Huguenard.
- Presse Med. 1986 Oct 11; 15 (34): 171917221719-22.
AbstractThe choice and timing of therapeutic methods for injuries of the lower limbs were evaluated in 60 patients. Primary amputation had to be performed in 18 of them, and conservative treatment was attempted in the others. Sixteen secondary amputations were necessary, mostly for arterial lesions. These results were not in agreement with the general severity of injury, as evaluated by the Injurity Severity Score. There was a significant difference in mortality depending on whether it was decided to amputate secondarily or to preserve the limb. When local signs of complication were present, this difference was highly significant. Age over 50 and arterial lesions were aggravating factors. When present together with an already high severity score, these factors should suggest immediate amputation as a life-saving measure.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.