• Maeve Haran, David Killeen, Mike Healy, Peadar Brophy, Aoife Donohue, Imelda Whyte, and Brendan Doody.
• Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland. maeve.haran@ucd.ie.
• Ir J Med Sci. 2023 Dec 1; 192 (6): 292929362929-2936.

BackgroundThere has been a global effort to reduce the use of restrictive interventions (RIs) in healthcare settings. In order to reduce unnecessary RIs, it is essential to understand their use in mental health settings. To date, there have been few studies examining the use of RIs in child and adolescent mental health settings, with no such studies in Ireland.AimsThe purpose of this study is to examine the prevalence and frequency of physical restraints and seclusion and to identify any associated demographic and clinical characteristics.MethodsThis is a 4-year retrospective study of the use of seclusion and physical restraint in an Irish child and adolescent psychiatric inpatient unit from 2018 to 2021. Computer-based data collection sheets and patient records were retrospectively reviewed. Eating disorder and non-eating disorder samples were analysed.ResultsOf 499 hospital admissions from 2018 to 2021, 6% (n = 29) had at least one episode of seclusion and 18% (n = 88) had at least one episode of physical restraint. Age, gender and ethnicity were not significantly associated with rates of RI. Unemployment, prior hospitalization, involuntary legal status and longer length of stay were significantly associated with higher rates of RIs in the non-eating disorder group. Involuntary legal status was associated with higher rates of physical restraint in the eating disorder group. Patients with a diagnosis of eating disorder and psychosis had the highest prevalence of physical restraints and seclusions respectively.ConclusionsIdentifying youth who are at greater risk of requiring RIs may allow early and targeted intervention and prevention.© 2023. The Author(s).

22 keywords...

hide…