-
- Richard Schamp and Leigh Tenkku.
- Department of Community and Family Medicine, St. Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63104, USA. schampro@slu.edu
- J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2006 Jul 1;7(6):339-44.
ObjectivesTo test the effect of an innovative method of documenting present and advance health care wishes on the rates of completion and the qualitative choices of health care wishes.DesignInterventional prospective cohort (pre- and post-).SettingProgram for All-inclusive Care of the Elderly (PACE) site in St. Louis, MO.ParticipantsEnrolled PACE participants.InterventionA documentation tool that captures both present and advance directives in a framework of "pathways," blending goals of care with typical procedure-oriented directives.MeasurementsData from medical records to calculate rates of health care wishes (HCW) completion, proportions of qualitative choices, and compliance with wishes at death.ResultsBaseline prevalences of present directives (PD) and advance directives (AD) were 77% and 36%, respectively, while Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) wishes were documented in 48% of PD and 26% of AD. After implementation of the Pathways Tool, completion rates increased to 99% for both PD and AD. Documented DNR wishes decreased to 38% of PD and increased to 66% of AD. Qualitative choices for care (Longevity vs Function vs Palliation) changed toward a palliation pathway for AD (from 9% to 53%). The rate of dying at home increased from 24% to 65%. Compliance with end-of-life wishes increased from 72% to 96%. These are statistically significant.ConclusionIntroduction of a novel pathways method of documenting HCW in a PACE site was associated with increased completion, preferences toward less invasive levels of care at life's end, and increased compliance with participants' wishes and deaths at home. Future research to validate the methodology employed in this intervention should be conducted in other long-term care settings.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.