• Seda Yilmaz, Mikail Dağ, Muhammet Cemal Kizilarslanoğlu, and Abdulkadir Baştürk.
• Department of Internal Medicine, Clinic of Hematology, Konya City Hospital, Konya, Turkey.
• Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Oct 13; 102 (41): e35395e35395.

AbstractOur aim was to determine the laboratory parameters that distinguish pseudothrombocytopenia from true thrombocytopenia. A total of 107 patients who were referred to the adult hematology outpatient clinic with thrombocytopenia and subsequently diagnosed with acute myeloid leukaemia, immune thrombocytopenia and pseudothrombocytopenia were included in our study. Hemogram parameters on admission, platelet value in the control hemogram and peripheral smear findings were recorded. Forty three (40.2%) males and 64 (59.8%) females, were included in our study. There were 25 patients in the leukaemia group, 39 in the immune thrombocytopenia group and 43 in the pseudothrombocytopenia group. Control platelet value and red cell distribution width/platelet ratio were found to be statistically significantly different between the 3 groups. Receiver operating characteristic analysis based on platelet values showed that platelet value ≤ 38,000/µL (86% sensitivity, 78.1% specificity, P < .001), difference between 2 consecutively measured platelet levels ≤ 11. 000/µL (79.1% sensitivity, 79.7% specificity, P < .001), red cell distribution width/platelet ratio ≥ 0.413 (90.7% sensitivity, 78.1% specificity, P < .001) were found to be in favor of true thrombocytopenia. In the differentiation of pseudothrombocytopenia and true thrombocytopenia, the difference between the hemogram parameters at the time of admission and the platelet count in the control blood count may be guiding. This result may reduce patient and physician anxiety and prevent patient referral.Copyright © 2023 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.

22 keywords...

hide…