• Xiaomeng Tong, Yongtong Cao, Min Yu, and Chengwu Han.
• Department of Laboratory Medicine, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
• Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2015 Jan 1;11:1027-33.

BackgroundThe diagnosis of sepsis remains a clinical challenge. Many studies suggest that presepsin plays a role in diagnosing sepsis, but the results remain controversial. This study aimed to identify the overall diagnostic accuracy of presepsin for sepsis through meta-analysis.MethodsA systematic literature search was performed in PubMed and EMBASE to identify studies evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of presepsin in sepsis patients. Data were retrieved and the pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) were calculated. A summary receiver operating characteristic curve and area under curve (AUC) were used to evaluate the overall diagnostic performance. The statistical analysis was performed using Stata 12.0 and Meta-DiSc 1.4 software.ResultsEleven publications with 3,106 subjects were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and DOR were 0.83 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.77-0.88), 0.81 (95% CI 0.74-0.87), 4.43 (95% CI 3.05-6.43), 0.21 (95% CI 0.14-0.30), and 21.56 (95% CI 10.59-43.88), respectively. The area under the curve was 0.89 (95% CI 0.86-0.92). Estimated positive and negative post-probability values for a sepsis prevalence of 20% were 53% and 5%, respectively. No publication bias was identified.ConclusionBased on currently available evidence, presepsin may have a valuable role in the diagnosis of sepsis, and its results should be interpreted carefully in the context of clinical condition and traditional markers.

4 keywords...

hide…